Home > Search Clinical Trials > Psychiatry - Child and Adolescent
Clinical Trials: Psychiatry - Child and Adolescent
IRB No. 02-016-1 (Dr. Robert Aseltine, PI): Pathways from Childhood Adversity to Adult Mental Health
Study description not available
IRB No. 08-280-2 (Dr. Daniel Connor, PI): Assessment of Children in Outpatient Psychiatric Treatment
The study aims to analyze medical chart data from two child psychiatry outpatient clinics. The goal of the study is to learn about the characteristics and needs of children in outpatient psychiatric treatment and their families and who they respond to different forms of psychiatric and psychological treatment, in order to improve treatment services.
IRB No. 15-157-6 (Dr. Golda Ginsburg, PI): Unified Treatment of Emotional Disorders in Community Clinics
Emotional disorders, encompassing a range of anxiety and depressive disorders, are the most prevalent and comorbid psychiatric disorders in adolescence. Evidence-based therapies (EBTs) exist for single disorders (e.g., depression) or small clusters of disorders (e.g., anxiety disorders) but such EBTs are rarely integrated in community mental health clinic (CMHC) settings and effect sizes are modest (40-50% of youth are treatment non-responders). Thus, methods for improving outcomes for these youth, particularly in CMHCs, are needed. Transdiagnostic treatment, such as the Unified Protocols for the Treatment of Emotional Disorders in adults (UP), adolescents (UP-A) and children (UP-C) is a promising new approach that uses a small number of common strategies to treat these conditions. Another novel approach to improving clinical outcomes for youth with emotional disorders in CMHCs is the incorporation of a standardized measurement and feedback system (MFS). Emerging data suggests that MFS alone improves outcomes relative to treatment as usual (TAU) but this has not been adequately tested in youth. Thus, our first aim is to examine the effectiveness of UP-A and a MFS relative to TAU, when delivered in CMHCs. A serious shortcoming of RCTs comparing EBTs to TAU is the confounding effects of increased measurement and feedback to clinicians as RCTs of EBTs often “build in” monitoring that is not part of standard care. This raises the possibility that increased monitoring, rather than the unique treatment components of the EBT, may be responsible for better outcomes over TAU. Thus, the second aim of this proposal is to isolate these effects from UP-A. Finally, this study will examine theoretically-linked mechanisms (both patient and provider level) of treatment outcomes of both the UP-A and the Youth Outcomes Questionnaire (YOQ). This project is an NIMH-funded collaborative R01 two -site trial (UM grant PIs Jill Ehrenreich-May and Amanda Jensen-Doss; University of Connecticut PI Golda Ginsburg - for IRB purposes, the UM PI will be Amanda Jensen-Doss). To address the three study aims, adolescents with anxiety and/or depressive disorders will be recruited from CMHCs in Miami and in CT (under the supervision of Dr. Golda Ginsburg at the University of Connecticut). Both adolescents and clinicians will be randomized to one of three conditions: (1) TAU alone; (2) TAU plus YOQ (TAU+); and (3) UP-A plus YOQ (UP-A). Research assessments by Independent Evaluators (IEs), children, parents, and clinicians will occur at baseline, 8 weeks and 16 weeks after treatment initiation and a 3-month follow-up. The primary aims of this study are as follows: Aim 1: To examine the effectiveness of UP-A and YOQ compared to TAU. Aim 1 will test whether adolescents treated with UP-A and YOQ (plus TAU referred to as TAU +) demonstrate better response than those receiving TAU alone. Hypothesis 1: A higher percent of adolescents treated with UP-A and TAU +, compared to TAU, will be treatment responders at 16 weeks after treatment initiation and at follow-up. Aim 2: To isolate the effects of evidenced-based measurement and feedback. Aim 2 will examine the relative effectiveness of the UP-A condition to the TAU+ condition. Hypothesis 2: A higher percent of UP-A participants will be treatment responders than TAU+ participants at the 16 week and follow up assessments. Aim 3: To examine mechanisms theoretically associated with UP-A and YOQ. Hypothesis 3a: Differences in outcomes between the UP-A and the other two conditions will be mediated by changes in: Emotional Reactivity and Regulation (Using the Reactivity and Regulation-Images Task, REAR-I) and Behavioral Avoidance (using the Avoidance Hierarchy).
IRB No. 20-123-1 (Dr. David FitzGerald, PI): Child Clinic Registry
The objective of this project is to develop a data registry. A registry collects, processes, stores and distributes data for future scientific investigation. The registry will consist of medical record information obtained from patients treated at Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Outpatient Clinic at UConn Health. The treatment in this clinic is focused on addressing psychological and psychiatric behaviors.
IRB No. 18-201COS-1 (Dr. Damion Grasso, PI): Adaptation and Resilience in Childhood Study U01
In the current application we propose applying advances in developmental measurement science, including those developed in our own lab, towards sensitive characterization of interpersonal violence (IV) exposure, biobehavioral indicators of threat detection and reactivity, trauma-related psychopathology, and contextual risk and protective factors in a high-risk sample of preschool age children. Assessment will include (1) the Family Socialization Interview-Modified (FSI-M), a comprehensive interview measuring children's experiences from birth to present, including family stressors, parenting practices and family conflict that was developed in our lab, (2) the Anxiety Dimensional Observation System (ANX-DOS) and (3) the Disruptive Behavior Dimensional Observation System (DB-DOS), two laboratory observation paradigms for characterizing fear/anxiety and anger/affect regulation, respectively, also developed in our lab, (3) a multiple source assessment of trauma exposure and trauma-related symptoms as defined by the DSM-5, (4) attention bias, autonomic (heart rate, skin conductance), and electrophysiological (Event-related potentials) responses to laboratory-based threat stimuli, and (5) observed and reported maternal sensitivity and parent-child interaction. In the current project, families will be recruited from domestic violence shelters and communities surrounding the shelters. Some families will have experienced IV and others will not. Research visits will occur at our child-friendly laboratory on the UConn Kane Street property in West Hartford and will last approximately four hours. Families will be compensated for their time. Should the mother deem it necessary to split the visit due to time contraints, consenting and assessments may be conducted at a different location that the mother deems safe and affords privacy. Specific Aims: Specific Aim 1. To demonstrate that how children respond to negative (threat) stimuli presented in the laboratory is related to their symptoms of fear and distress. Specific Aim 2. To test the hypothesis that how children respond to threat stimuli is the link between their exposure to interpersonal violence and the development of symptoms of fear and distress. Specific Aim 3. To test the hypothesis that mothers' responsiveness to their children will shape children's threat reactivity and the development of symptoms over time.